Recent Headlines in the IP World:
- Ian Pedersen: AgriFORCE Granted Patent from the United States Patent and Trademark Office Related to its Automated Growing Facility, FORCEGH+ (Source: Yahoo Finance)
- Supantha Mukherjee and Stine Jacobsen: Nokia, Ericsson Slump as Patent Fights Hit Margins (Source: Reuters)
- Kelcee Griffis: Litigation Finance Gains Traction in Patent Infringement Cases (Source: Bloomberg Law)
- Brett Foote: Ford Patent Filed for Ev Cable with Inductor Portion (Source: Ford Authority)
Commentary and Journal Articles:
- Atty. Christopher K. Larus, Atty. Miles A Finn, Dr. Congnan Zhan, Dr. Joseph (Yu) Chen, and Dr. Shelley R. Gilliss: Patent Value: Scoring Patents Using Characteristics of Patents in Litigation (Source: SSRN)
- Dr. Garry Gabison: Defensive Patenting and Portfolio Synergies: the Impact of Patent Invalidation on the Renewal of Citing Patents (Source: SSRN)
- Prof. Richard Epstein: Market Competition as a Constitutional Virtue: A Defense of Lochner and a Revitalized Dormant Commerce Clause (Source: SSRN)
New Job Postings on Patently-O:
- Dorsey
- Christensen O’Connor Johnson Kindness PLLC
- Sunstein LLP
- Faegre Drinker–Intellectual Property Patent Associate – Electrical Engineering, Optics, or Physics
- Faegre Drinker–Intellectual Property Patent Agent – Electrical Engineering, Optics, or Physics
- Faegre Drinker–Intellectual Property Patent Agent or Technical Specialist – Biotechnology/Biochemistry
Old but still relevant.
link to youtube.com
Is it still relevant? He cites figures about institution rates that are totally obsolete by now.
Here’s an interesting patent nugget that made its way into a post over at Volokh.
link to reason.com
The Richard Epstein piece was included in the 2 Oct edition. Why is it being reprised in this edition as well?
So we can point and laugh all over again?
Clearly, these “snippets” have long been a reflection of the desired editorial narrative.
It is funny though how Malcolm chimes in, given that the particularly noted item is attempting to diminish the stick of the patent grant.
anon, the WSJ is so biased that they delete comments that include the word M a r x i s t.
Also, I cut and pasted Thomas Sowell’s words into one comment and the WSJ deleted it and said it violated community guidelines.
It is pretty clear that the WSJ has these M a r xists that are reading all the comments and deleting comments that don’t fit their narrative.
Where is this “WSJ” inference coming from? None of the items here reflect that source.
Looks like a neo-M arxist to me. I really don’t get how anyone can support the idea that some wa n k sits back and figures out how things should be.
You need markets. W a n k ho l e judges need to apply laws and keep their h a nd s out of their gen it al region while deciding that they can figure out how things should be.
F’ing Marxi sts.
Sorry, I do not quite understand whom you mean. Are you calling Prof. Epstein a Marxist, or the judges who do not presently follow Prof. Epstein’s maxim?
Comments are closed.