My exhaustive (and last, really I promise!) post about why 101 is not a defense, nor properly raised in CBM proceedings

This is from a declaration I filed in a patent case. I.               Because Section 101 is not “specified” as a “condition for patentability,” and, further, is not a condition for patentability, a “violation” of Section 101 may not be raised in a covered business method proceeding. The starting point of my analysis is a consideration … Continue reading My exhaustive (and last, really I promise!) post about why 101 is not a defense, nor properly raised in CBM proceedings