In re Aqua: Ambiguity in the Statute Means Deference to the PTO

In re Aqua (Fed. Cir. 2016) In its newly filed brief in this pending en banc case, the USPTO sets forth the three statutory provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 316 that are related to amendment practice in an Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings: §§ 316(a)(9); (d)(1); and (e). [Aqua Products–PTO brief.] Taking them out of order: … Continue reading In re Aqua: Ambiguity in the Statute Means Deference to the PTO