In re Aqua: Ambiguity in the Statute Means Deference to the PTO
In re Aqua (Fed. Cir. 2016) In its newly filed brief in this pending en banc case, the USPTO sets forth the three statutory provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 316 that are related to amendment practice in an Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings: §§ 316(a)(9); (d)(1); and (e). [Aqua Products–PTO brief.] Taking them out of order: … Continue reading In re Aqua: Ambiguity in the Statute Means Deference to the PTO
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed