by Dennis Crouch Prof. Hricik and I have both previously written about the Regeneron inequitable conduct decision.  The following short summary comes from Hricik: [The] district court … held that people substantively involved in prosecution of the ‘018 Patent knew of but-for material references, which were not disclosed.  Although the district court had intended to hold … Continue reading Regeneron v. Merus: En Banc Chances Rise