New Study on Trolls

The article is here, and it purports to be a critical empirical study which shows a much smaller percentage of cases come from trolls than has been reported.

About David

Professor of Law, Mercer University School of Law. Formerly Of Counsel, Taylor English Duma, LLP and in 2012-13, judicial clerk to Chief Judge Rader.

8 thoughts on “New Study on Trolls

  1. 6

    I’m not sure I understand, but if it makes you feel better my post about the troll commercial didn’t get posted! (I wrote: “I can’t wait for prices to drop!” What silliness.)

  2. 4

    Another 6 word headline (related to the main blog pages):

    “Who” is censored – Content Doesn’t Matter

  3. 3

    Completely agree Prof. Hricik.

    The free alienability of property that is a cornerstone of US Patent Law needs just a little more respect.

  4. 1

    Professor, of the listed groups, which are the trolls? Do they include or exclude failed startups?

    If they are excluded, then when a IP holding company or large aggregator asserts patents on behalf of a failed startup, why is it that the failed startup is now a troll?

Comments are closed.