Almost exactly one year ago (here), I explained that McKool Smith had been accused of violating a prosecution bar based upon a disagreement, or misunderstanding, about when the bar-dated ended. While we do not yet have, “the rest of the story,” (you old folks will get the Paul Harvey reference), in an order dated September 18, 2018, Judge Corley in Eolast Tech., Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (here) shows the matter is still on-going. In it, apparently after McKool and its client produced documents in redacted form, the judge ordered them produced without the redactions.
Hide comments