- Congressional Action on Patent Reform:
-
Senator Leahy has posted a note on his website (link) criticizing Bilski because it “needlessly left the door open for business method patents to issue in the future, and I am concerned that it will lead to more unnecessary litigation.”
-
Leahy is looking at Bilski as a mechanism for driving legislative reforms: “The courts, however, are constrained by the text of our outdated statutes, and it is time for Congress to act.”
- Anti-tax-patent activists (i.e., most tax lawyers and accountants) are now thinking about pushing for a legislative exception.
-
-
EPO Count System: At a recent meeting in Edinburgh, the EPO Vice-President for legal and international affairs mentioned that EPO patent examiners receive twice as much credit for rejecting an application than for allowing the application “because, as everyone knows, a rejection takes much more work than an allowance.” (Is this correct?)
- Patent law jobs posted in the past week:
- Baker Botts in Palo Alto
- In house at POET (Ethonol Producer) in Soux Falls, SD
- In house at Medicis in Scotsdale
- In house at Maquet Cardiovascular in Mahwah, NJ
- In House IP Management for the Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC)
- In house at Medtronic in Memphis
- In house at Roche in Pleasanton, CA
- In house Licensing at Promega in Madison
- Marjama Muldoon in Syracuse
Hide comments