Patent Jobs:
- Roberts Mlotkowski Safran & Cole is seeking a patent attorney with 2-4 years of experience and a degree in electrical engineering. [Link]
- Skiermont Puckett is searching for one or more associate attorneys with 3 or more years of patent litigation experience. [Link]
- Roberts Mlotkowski Safran & Cole is looking for a patent attorney with 2-4 years of experience and a chemical background. [Link]
- Wolf Greenfield is seeking a patent agent or technology specialist who has experience working as a patent examiner in the Biotechnology field. [Link]
- Greenberg Traurig is searching for a patent agent with 1-3 years of experience. [Link]
- Wilen Group is looking for an in-house patent attorney with an engineering background. [Link]
- Cantor Colburn is seeking an associate patent attorney with 2-5 years of experience. [Link]
- Lee & Hayes is searching for patent attorneys with at least 3 years of experience. [Link]
- Maginot, Moore & Beck is looking for a patent attorney with 1-5 years of experience and a background in electrical engineering. [Link]
- The Webb Law Firm is seeking associates with a background in metallurgical engineering. [Link]
- Thompson Hine is searching for a patent attorney with 2-3 years of experience. [Link]
- King & Spalding is looking for a patent agent with 2-4 years of experience and a background in engineering. [Link]
- Aspen Aerogels is seeking a patent agent/IP analyst with 5+ years of experience. [Link]
- Myriad Genetics is seeking a patent attorney with 2-5 years of experience and a background in molecular biology. [Link]
In the expressway of logic, Malcolm, you are a stuck-on-red traffic light. As someone who has confessed that he has never been involved with a charge of IC, you would not know “inequitable conduct expertise” if it rolled right up to you and belted you.
Office stooges like you should stop masquerading as real attornets. Your over-saturated loathing of real attorneys drips from your comments, and highlights your desire to be that which you failed to be.
a comment about the in toto level of cases
Anyone curious about Shilling’s “grasp of actual issues” need only look at Shilling’s last twenty or thirty comments.
Just take a look.
The shilling just does not stop with this one – never mind that Malcolm cannot tell the difference between one argument that deals with rate of incidence (IC just being pled in too many of the cases) and a comment about the in toto level of cases (there really is a low level of litigation in its own right).
Maclolm, your grasp of actual issues continues to underwhelm.
What exactly is a car with four wheels?
I like this game.
What exactly is a litigator with inequitable conduct expertise?
A lot of prosecution, which surprises me given all the patent litigation and media attention of late. That might just be because of PatentlyO’s audience, or perhaps the patent litigation frenzy is overblown.
Great point. I noticed also that nobody is looking for a litigator with inequitable conduct expertise. Maybe because the so-called “plague” is just a myth.
“or perhaps the patent litigation frenzy is overblown”
Shhhhh – that would devalue the whole “troll” scare.
Things must be picking up — this seems to be a lot more job postings than usual. A lot of prosecution, which surprises me given all the patent litigation and media attention of late. That might just be because of PatentlyO’s audience, or perhaps the patent litigation frenzy is overblown.
Myriad must have just fired the attorney who drafted the method claims that went down in flames.
Comments are closed.