Patently-O Bits & Bytes by Lawrence Higgins June 2, 2011PatentAbstract Idea, Licenses, paid, Subject Matter Eligibility, Trade SecretsLawrence Higgins To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Patently-O Bits & Bytes by Lawrence Higgins June 2, 2011PatentAbstract Idea, Licenses, paid, Subject Matter Eligibility, Trade SecretsDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Arris Group v. BT: Vendors and DJ Standing May 27, 2011PatentLicenses, paidJason Rantanen To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Who is the Client?: Advising Inventors, their Spouses, and their Start-Up Companies May 19, 2011PatentLicenses, paidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Intellectual Ventures: Revealing Investors May 18, 2011PatentLicenses, paidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Malpractice: Failure to Thoroughly Advise in Settlement Negotiations May 8, 2011PatentLicenses, paidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Rembrandt v. AOL: Licensing and Indefiniteness May 1, 2011Indefinite, PatentLicenses, obviousness, paidJason Rantanen To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Third Party Attempts to Protest or Otherwise Oppose the Grant of a Published Application April 26, 2011PatentLicenses, paid, USPTO DirectorDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Nortel, Google, and the Ongoing Rights of Licensees in Bankruptcy [Updated] April 20, 2011PatentLicenses, paid, VenueDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Summary of Microsoft v. i4i Oral Argument April 18, 2011PatentLicenses, paid, Personal JurisdictionJason Rantanen To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
US Government Asks for Increased Deference When Patent Applicants Challenge BPAI Decisions in Court April 11, 2011PatentAIA Trials, anticipation, double patenting, Enablement, Federal Circuit En Banc, Licenses, obviousness, paid, PGR, Supreme Court, Venue, Written DescriptionDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Confidentiality Designations in Federal Circuit Appeals April 7, 2011PatentLicenses, Marking, paidJason Rantanen To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
FTC Report Gives NPEs a new name (PAE), Recommends That Courts and the PTO improve Patent Notice and Damages April 1, 2011PatentDamages, Licenses, obviousness, paid, Supreme CourtDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
White House Recommends Increased Criminal Penalties for Intellectual Property Crimes March 16, 2011PatentLicenses, paid, Trade SecretsDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Patent Reform in the House of Representatives: March 10, 2011PatentAbstract Idea, AIA Trials, anticipation, Enablement, Federal Circuit En Banc, Inequitable Conduct, IPR, Licenses, Marking, obviousness, paid, Printed Publication, Subject Matter Eligibility, VenueDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
ABB v Cooper: The Broad Scope of Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction March 9, 2011PatentLicenses, paidJason Rantanen To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Patently-O Bits & Bytes February 1, 2011PatentLicenses, paid, USPTO DirectorDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Uniloc v. Microsoft: The CAFC Rejects the 25 Percent Rule January 4, 2011Damages, Infringement, Invalidity, Patent, Patent Cases 2011, Rantanen, SoftwareAbstract Idea, Claim Construction, Licenses, paid, Subject Matter Eligibility, VenueJason Rantanen To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
WiAV Solutions v. Motorola: Clarifying the Meaning of “Exclusive Licensee” December 27, 2010Infringement, License, Patent, Patent Cases 2010, RantanenLicenses, paidJason Rantanen To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Intellectual Ventures Takes First Overt Legal Actions to Enforce its Mammoth Patent Portfolio December 8, 2010Infringement, License, PatentLicenses, paidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.