by Dennis Crouch
Hyatt v. USPTO (Fed. Cir. 2018) (Judges HUGHES, Reyna, and Wallach)
This billionaire gets no respect! Gilbert Hyatt is the named invenetor on 70+ US patents and has 400+ pending patent applications "all of which were filed prior to June 8, 1995." That date is critical because those "pre-GATT" applications will remain in force for 17-years from their issue date (if they ever issue). These applications claim priority back to the early 1970s. For the past 10 years, Hyatt has been trying to get his cases heard by the PTAB - but has been repeatedly foiled by PTO delays and unilateral reopening of prosecution. Here, the Federal Circuit sided with the PTO in Hyatt's generalized challenge to this practice -- finding portions of his his petition time-barred and that the substance of his challenge lacked merit.
The Big Deal for this case for the rest of us: If the PTO has spelled out an improper practice within the MPEP, an APA challenge on procedure or policy must be filed within six years of MPEP publication, if at all. Also, the Court says its fine for the USPTO to reopen prosecution rather than hearing the appeal.
To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.