Recent Headlines in the IP World:
- Paddy Baker: Ripple Wins US Patent for New Oracle-Based Smart Contract Design (Source: Yahoo Finance)
- Valerie Bauman: Third Circuit Limits FTC Ability to Recoup Profits From AbbVie (1) (Source: Bloomberg Law)
- Jon Cohen: The Latest Round in the CRISPR Patent Battle has an Apparent Victor, But the Fight Continues (Source: Scientific American)
- Mike Peterson: Future HomeKit System Could Track Users Through Rooms, Authenticate Via Biometrics (Source: Apple Insider)
Commentary and Journal Articles:
- Prof. Muhammad Farooq Ahmad, Prof. Eric de Bodt, and Prof. Jarrad Harford: The Innovation Arms Race (Source: SSRN)
- Prof. Jorge L. Contreras: Chapter 2 – Ownership and Assignment of Intellectual Property (Source: SSRN)
- Prof. Emile Loza de Siles: AI, on the Law of the Elephant: Toward Understanding Artificial Intelligence (Source: SSRN)
New Job Postings on Patently-O:
Good grief, forgive the typos.
Interesting the FTC has an administrative ‘court’ them commissioner review to seek disgorgment but it choses enforcement in the District Court as a faster, simpler venue under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act. Any of you Sherman Act killers know how the interplay between a District court preliminary or permanent injunction/remedy (Art III) and the FTC Commission (Art II). For example, does the APJ accept under comity the findings of fact and law by a District Court judgment? Does the Commission get to collaterally attack the finds of law and fact of the district court judgment – after for example the final judgment of the district court?
Comments are closed.