The question on everyone’s mind is how the patent office and patent system will be restructured once Donald Trump becomes president. Trump has substantial personal experience protecting and enforcing his own trademarks, including attempts to protect more controversial marks such as ‘you’re fired.’ However his businesses have few if any patent rights and have relied on the perception of luxury rather than innovation for their successes. An element of Trumps campaign was the recognition that he personally understands how to find an exploit loopholes in government regulation and that his experience make him uniquely qualified to fix the holes. Question for the patent system is whether president Trump will see patent trolls, pharmaceutical pricing, and the Eastern District of Texas as exploitations needing to be fixed. It is unclear at this point who will manage the transition team but hope for a smooth transition from Outgoing Director Michelle Lee to the next USPTO leader. Democracy!
The way to think about this properly is to understand the history of modern patents. Jimmy Carter went about creating the Fed. Cir. to end the great malaise. Ronald Reagan then signed the Bill that created the Fed. Cir.
The national economy boomed and the great malaise ended due to patents.
Now, Google and the likes of Lee have destroyed the patent system and we are at 1 percent growth and companies like Google saying that they can do all the innovation. That we should give them tax breaks and get out of the way of the “Moonshot” division so they can provide all the innovation that the country needs while still maintaining Google as a monopoly.
Please.
Let’s hope that Trump sees the way forward to greater economic growth as a much stronger patent system with the IPR repealed and directors like Lee a distance nightmare.
You would have better luck if you “repealed” Citizens United first.
I wonder if you guys heard, we’re either already have enough or need just one more state legislature to call a constitutional convention of the state’s reps where they can reign in the fed gov for the rest of our lives.
Who’s “we”?
We ‘Mericans fool.
Did you see how well the populace are liking your media lately?
link to youtube.com
Even MSNBC having a come to the big j moment.
link to youtube.com
“My media”? What?
Yes, your media. The media that just shilled for your candidate for the last few months.
Guess you saw the backstage going viral. Warning lefty fbombs.
link to youtube.com
That’s not “my media” 6.
I wonder where u got the idea that it was ….
“I wonder where u got the idea that it was”
From your constant “isting”, posting nonsense articles (agitprop really just meant to stir people up) among other nonsense issuing forth from your fingers. You didn’t know that such paints you as a lefty idi ot nowadays? Swear to go d, you need to get out more, you’re like living in society 50 years ago.
lefties turning on their own, delicious.
link to youtube.com
Which “Mericans” are those, 6? The frustrated racists or the frustrated misogynists? Or the just plain vanilla frustrated white guy? And whats your awesome solution? Tell everybody, 6! Stop beating around the bush. You don’t have to be PC anymore!
“Which “Mericans” are those, 6?”
All Mericans.
Going to be a hoot if we can get this party started! I can’t wait. It’ll be one of the largest happenings of our time.
” The frustrated racists or the frustrated misogynists?”
Everybody’s an IST! Lol, lefties.
“And whats your awesome solution?”
Mah awesome solution to wut? My solutions are kind of irrelevant tho, you’ll be getting the republican state lawmaker’s solutions.
Malcolm is just a leftIST liberal elitIST still living in denial that the DNC candidate (with ties to the Banksters) did not ascend to her throne as scheduled.
His bucket of tears runneth over.
The only sad thing is that you did not join in bringing about the MAGAing anon. I at least hope you went down ticket red even if you couldn’t take the Don.
I wrote in Bernie and took the rest without regard to Red or Blue but instead based on merits.
Elephant CRP is still CRP.
Yes but Trump needs the best bac kup he can get against the SJ W/femi n azi/progr essive hordes. And their ai n’t but 2 par ties (really).
Plus, bonus, if we get the state legislatures together we’re within spitting distance of ending a lot of the federal level nonsense bickering forever. If only a few more republicans get on board the constitutional convention wagon they could end the fed eral gov’s authority over many matters thro w ing them permanently to the states. Then our fed eral elec tions could concei vably become MU CH more bor ing (which for the lov e of go d would be amazing I’m sure all can agree). Let the people that really care battle out the really contentious stuff at the state level instead of trying to make feder al “righ ts” etc. out of everything by usur ping power for the fed eral gov.
Maybe Trump can create a ton of new awesome jobs by encouraging the PTO to grant more patents that are offensive to ethnic groups and women! Here’s Trump’s new chief strategist, Steve Bannon:
Among Bannon’s contributions to the media discourse: Declaring the Trump-opposing conservative Bill Kristol a “renegade Jew”; articles declaring that “birth control makes women unattractive and crazy”; advocating that women who receive online harassment should “log off”; support for public display of the confederate flag; multiple stories about “trannies” and “f@ggots”. During divorce proceedings against him, Gannon’s wife testified that he was aggressively anti-Semitic.
Sounds like an awesome guy. But I bet he’s super serious and smart! It’s so “PC”, after all, to ign0re serious super civilized people like Steve Bannon. Oh, I can’t wait for all the awesome new jobs!
More here from the folks at Wilmer Hale: link to wilmerhale.com
Oh, what a wonderful world. At last, racists and misogynists are free to speak! The persecution of rich white men will end! We’re saved! Yay!
LOL
How would a patent be offensive to ethnic groups or women?
The veneer of mentioning “patent” does not hide the political sniping.
The attempt itself only speaks of arseness.
Yay ecosystem!
How would a patent be offensive to ethnic groups or women?
Try to believe it, folks.
Remember: “anon” is an expert! He knows all about the stuff that people patent (in theory).
But he’s totally stumped by the idea of an offensive patent.
Still, he’s very serious. We have to pay attention to him! Otherwise we’ll end up like the Amish.
Why on earth are you so concerned about “offensive” patents?
A. who the fck cares about subjectively, or even objectively, “offensive” patents?
B. what makes you think such things are all of a sudden becoming the norm or even more than a triffle? Or for that matter even a triffle?
what makes you think such things are all of a sudden becoming the norm
Try to believe it, folks.
Malcolm,
Your non-answers as replies are nonsense.
Take away the ad hominem, and you have said absolutely nothing.
Anybody want to help Malcolm out?
I had asked Malcolm: How would a patent be offensive to ethnic groups or women?
And all that he could reply was:
“Try to believe it, folks.”
Somehow, and with no examples, he seems to feel that patents can be offensive to women or minorities. He even thinks that such would be SO obvious as to warrant his “Folks” meme.
Anybody out there with any examples of such nefarious items?
We all can be sure that Malcolm has none to share.
MM just fyi most of those articles are by Milo (who might get press secretary position) not Bannon, Milo writes whatever he wants to. Milo also is a Jew who works for Mr. “antisemitical” Bannon.
Keep on believing your misleading press that don’t know their ar se from a Jew, an author or a fact.
Nobody could have predicted that 6 gulps down Breitbart content like it’s kool-aid.
Keep on believing your misleading press
And there you have it, folks: Steve Bannon is just a regular guy, reminding people about how birth control makes women unattractive and crazy. Which is something we all really know to be true, right? But only 6 and Steve Bannon have the guts to just put it out there. And these guys know a lot about women. You can tell!
LOL
I read Milo’s stuff before I even knew what “brietbart” was as an org. It’s good stuff.
” Steve Bannon is just a regular guy, ”
Hardly, he’s a top guy at Breitbart. Maybe Milo’s boss. But allegedly Milo just runs wild and has total freedom.
“reminding people about how birth control makes women unattractive and crazy”
Again, that’s from Milo. Bannon likely cares very little about the topic, he’s more into actual politics as I understand it. More of an actual conservative republican than Milo will ever be.
“But only 6 and Steve Bannon have the guts to just put it out there.”
That article has been shared like a million times. And again, for the 100000000th time, it’s by Milo, not Bannon. I know your lefty brain can’t hardly comprehend two separate people existing in the world, but they do.
that’s from Milo. Bannon [Milo’s boss; the guy who pays Milo] likely cares very little about the topic
Everybody following along? 6 is making a super deep point here! And he’s a very serious person.
In other words MM doesn’t know how Breitbart works, who Milo is, or who Bannon is, and is just now joining in completely clueless and doesn’t think that anything makes any sense or is supar srs. It’s all an evil plan and managed by the top guy to make Milo write crazy sht that Milo talks about nonstop all day every day! It’s all Bannon I say! Milo totally wasn’t writing about such craziness before he got on at Breitbart writing about a variety of topics not that relevant to politics! It simply must be evidence of “MUH EVIL ISMS!”
Lulz. You lefties and your isms. They literally rule your everyday life. Meanwhile most of Merica has moved on from ur isms.
“ know your lefty brain can’t hardly comprehend two separate people existing in the world, but they do.”
LOL – that’s just Malcolm’s old ploy of wanting to smear anyone who disagrees with him with anything that anyone else has ever said.
Being actually accurate with the particular views that they hold is just “too much work” for Malcolm, and is not on his precious little script.
Note the rampant poker tells of “super deep” and “very serious” – Malcolm is W A Y over his head here, drowning in his little bucket of Wah.
“And these guys know a lot about women. ”
If you think that article is wrong, then apparently more than you do.
these guys know ….more [about women] than you do.
LOL
I haven’t relied on a guy to tell me about women since I was, g0sh, nine years old maybe? But maybe that’s because I can just talk to women directly about women. And I know a lot of real smart ones.
30% of women of reproductive age take birth control pills. Are those the cr@zy unattractive women? Rhetorical question, of course.
When are you going to come out again as the shameless g@y-bashing a h0le that we know you to be, 6? My memory is pretty good. You should feel safe now. Let it all out (again). Because you’re a very serious person. Freedom! Go for it, 6.
Or just tell us more about women. Share your favorite articles with us.
“I haven’t relied on a guy to tell me about women since I was, g0sh, nine years old maybe?”
In other words you’re still as clueless as you were when you were 9.
“But maybe that’s because I can just talk to women directly about women.”
Oh wait, except for absorbing that clueless gynocentric worldview directly from the source! Who could have guessed this is how MM came by his awesome and deep gynocentric worldview? As he likes to say: Nobody could have predicted!
“And I know a lot of real smart ones.”
And most of them don’t have babies thanks to your generation’s gynocentrism. Congratulations! Really super smart women! Elite one might even say…
“Are those the cr@zy unattractive women?”
Not necessarily. Going on (or off for that matter) will definitely affect the way the girl behaves in my experience (and in the experience of thousands of people reporting such including irl, gasp, grils). And, if you were attracted to the girl before that change, yes, they may well have have become now a less attractive woman thanks to the change. Some small weight gain is also definitely a potential side effect observed at least a small amount of the time irl, but I haven’t seen that to be such a big issue in my experience.
See a whole host of journal articles that Milo didn’t get around to citing for your dmbas.
Stu pid ol scientryists! Link to 5 second googled actual journal inside. From the linked to actual article inside: “In this article we summarize the sparse findings, describing brain structural, functional and behavioral findings from the literature and suggest that synthetic steroids may contribute to masculinizing as well as feminizing effects on brain and behavior.” Plenty more where this comes from. They’re all over of late. But of course you i di ots from yesteryear don’t care about such trivalities as fcking with society, as long as women are “free” (muh gynocentrissssssmmmm!)!
link to lifesitenews.com
BTW, rumor is that modern birth control for women couldn’t even pass FDA approval if it were to go through trials these days. But thanks to the laxness of yesteryear and modern politics we’re blessed with this grand social experiment on millions of women even today.
“g@y-bashing”
Why would I bash Milo? You’re the one “bashing” his work and his boss. You hom ophobe!
“Gynocentric?”
LOL
Dennis you’ve got some real cleaning up to do now. Get ready! Oh, it’s going to be so much fun.
“Dennis you’ve got some real cleaning up to do now.”
The irony is stultifying.
“Oh, it’s going to be so much fun.”
a new throw away phrase added to Malcolm’s short script – yay ecosystem.
“LOL”
^MM loling at his own gynocentrism. Priceless.
The irony is this was one of the shortest blog posts, but generated the most comments.
Trump’s l ying mouthpiece Kellyanne Conway: [Journalist who criticized Trump] should be very careful about characterizing somebody in a legal sense. He thinks — he thinks he’s just being some kind of political pundit there, but I would say be very careful about the way you characterize it.”
That didn’t take long!
And there we have some more insight into how the Maniac-in-Chief may change the patent system: we’ll have to be more “careful” about we criticize it! Won’t that be awesome?
Nothing would be a certain tiny tiny group of well-heeled entitled junk patent lovers happier.
Edit for clarity: Nothing would make a certain tiny tiny group of well-heeled entitled junk patent lovers happier.
Nice mischaracterisation (probably by ur supar media). Conway was referring to Harry Reid not the journalist. Your media is like so bad now that it’s hurting financially.
link to nymag.com
your media
LOL What?
Conway was referring to Harry Reid not the journalist
That was my mistake. Not that it makes any difference whatsoever. if anything it makes Conway look like an even bigger idi0t.
“That was my mistake. ”
It was a mistake that you made thanks to terrible ignorant reporting that is a plague on this nation these last 3 or so years. And probably a little bit of gynocentrism played a tiny bit of a part since it already had you biased against Conway (yes, even though she is a woman, gynocentrism demands that you not like her because she is a woman with the “wrong” opinions on women, at least according to the media narrative of her).
“Not that it makes any difference whatsoever.”
It does make a difference whatsoever. It shows the terrible state of media reporting of late. And also a shade of gynocentrism. Though to be fair, gynocentrism taints nearly everything about modern life (esp in your area of the country I’m sure) so I mean, yes, it’s hard for the not so discerning eye to pick it out.
“if anything it makes Conway look like an even bigger idi0t.”
Hardly. Her and Trump appreciate the need to hold people (usually but not always lefties) spouting off about “bigotry” and the “isms” to account for the rampant defamation plaguing the land. Though this may need to happen at the state level. If Harry was implicating Trump in the legal sense he should be brought to trial the same as any other lefty (like yourself) to adjudicate defamation. For too long has this plague run rampant and tainted the political sphere. Republicans want to cut down on election fraud, democrats shout RAYCIST. Republicans want babies to pop out, democrats should SEXIST. Republicans want nice everyday marriages to benefit people trying to support the state through their unions, democrats shout PHOBIA. Republicans want xyz, democrats shout ISMS and PHOBIAS. Time for some consequences for your gamesmanship. You know, beyond republicans controlling nearly your whole gov. I, like many of my generation, tire of hearing your constant slanders of the other side and seeing them get “news” time because the media supports such happening. But I’m sure you’d be happy to go to your grave reading nonstop about x phobia and y isms. Time to crack on down.
Even now this dominates my headlines:
link to yahoo.com
Note that most of that isn’t even true of the alt-right itself. And notice who funds the 3 groups that are denouncing him. But, the organizations just slander away np.
Terrible reporting. It will cause you and millions of others to “oops” make mistakes about what is being referred to, because they keep the facts carefully hidden below the allegations being made by the organizations. And it just keeps on going because lefty media gonna lefty and “freedom of the press” to publish false and malicious agitation-propaganda.
Malcolm has always been about propaganda 6.
You just now catching wind of it because of the political subject matter.
He is exactly the same way with his anti-patentISMs.
Yes anon but there is a difference in scale as well. His being free to spout off on a blog all day if he wishes about whatev he wishes is different than a billion dollar industry (actually more) spouting nonstop defamation of their political opponents.
Not much difference there at all 6.
Different target? Sure. But that is the only reason you seem concerned here. Otherwise, the VERY SAME TACTIC is “alright” with you as it aligns with a shared desired End.
26…
24…
21…
Why?
LOL
Somehow “anon” — totally not a hypocritical hack! — forgets to mention post number 22.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL NWPA + “anon” = The Bobbsy Twins. The best and the brightest! We all love you two. Super cute.
That does not even come close to answering the question.
But more meaningless ad hominem from you is guaranteed – Yay ecosystem!
the question.
Remember, folks: “anon” knows about comment 22 but he doesn’t want to talk about it. But he’s a very serious person! Totally not a hypocritical hack who loves to polish his bff’s dirty shoes.
22 has nothing at all to do with your reposting the same schlock three times to be on top.
That you want to pretend otherwise only makes you more the arse.
22 has nothing at all to do with your reposting the same schlock three times
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Because 25 never happened either.
But “anon” is a very serious person. Tune in next time when he tells us what NWPA’s boots taste like.
25 has nothing at all to do with your reposting the same schlock three times to be on top.
That you want to pretend otherwise only makes you more the arse.
“very serious” and “boots taste” – more of the same lack of anything intelligent to say…
But keep pretending that your deflecting as a response serves as an answer to the question – no need to change your own decrepit behavior, now is there, eh Malcolm?
To clarify: yes, posts were made that moved your RE-post off of top-line – but the question has to do with YOU re-posting to claim that top-line (again and again and again).
Why are YOU so intent on claiming the top-line?
Maybe you want to try a substantive answer to the actual question and not your typical CRP…
One thing is for sure, this maniac s0 ci0path that was just elected to the highest office by the l0 west forms of humans on the planet knows more about litigation than any other President in history (with the exception of the President’s who were lawyers or judges):
link to vanityfair.com
[Trump’s attorney] Petrocelli added that no president-elect had ever been in pending litigation before taking office
That’s an interesting admission. Of course, educated people know that Trump has scores of lawsuits pending against him. Possibly well over a hundred. For some mysterious reason, our “liberal media” chose to pretty much ignore that fact (and the fact that this was an unprecedented situation). I suppose next we’ll hear some sob stories in the “liberal media” about how many of these suits are “frivolous” (because The Donald never files or threatens frivolous litigation himself).
Is it too early to start the impeachment clock?
Paid blogger attempting to blast comments, so re-posted. I am fine with a non-paid blogger posting, but a paid blogger like MM should not be permitted to submerge comments that are not part of his paid agenda, which is exactly what he does constantly.
The way to think about this properly is to understand the history of modern patents. Jimmy Carter went about creating the Fed. Cir. to end the great malaise. Ronald Reagan then signed the Bill that created the Fed. Cir.
The national economy boomed and the great malaise ended due to patents.
Now, Google and the likes of Lee have destroyed the patent system and we are at 1 percent growth and companies like Google saying that they can do all the innovation. That we should give them tax breaks and get out of the way of the “Moonshot” division so they can provide all the innovation that the country needs while still maintaining Google as a monopoly.
Please.
Let’s hope that Trump sees the way forward to greater economic growth as a much stronger patent system with the IPR repealed and directors like Lee a distance nightmare.
NWPA : Ronald Reagan then signed the Bill that created the Fed. Cir … the great malaise ended due to patents.
LOL
And the richest got relatively richer at levels that have never been approached since. Over the course of Reagan’s presidency, the share of the total income pie earned by the highest 1% of earners increased by 64%.
link to valuewalk.com
Yay! Go patents! Totally not about the “elites.”
LOLOLOL
Do you have any data whatsoever supporting your contention that the 64% number for that highest 1% came from patents (let alone from software patents)…?
Serious question Malcolm.
For you.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Hey, “anon”, remember when NWPA popped up here spoutin about how patent reformers were like “fundy k-lling people in Iraq” and you high fived him?
I do. I’ve got the whole thread archived and a bunch of others, too.
You’re his best friend.
Ask him for data to support his contention that “the great malaise ended due to patents.” Then we’ll know you aren’t a hypocritical hack. M’kay? Good luck.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Don’t need data, Malcolm – just use your common sense and appreciation of history.
(and its funny that you call for data, but never respond when people – including me – ask the same if you — why do you think that is?)
Seriously MM? That is the best you have on me? That I compared fundamentalist in the Middle East with anti-patent judicial activist who do not respect the rule of law and intentionally misrepresent science and the law for their own agenda thus undermining our legal system and our society.
I am very happy to stick to the comparison for the reasons listed above.
And yet another “reply” that provides NO answer to the question put to you.
Let’s try again then:
Do you have any data whatsoever supporting your contention that the 64% number for that highest 1% came from patents (let alone from software patents)…?
Serious question Malcolm.
For you.
Still waiting Malcolm.
And yet another instance where Malcolm avoids any semblance of an actual answer and has moved on to CRP all over the most current thread…
a paid blogger like MM
I’m not a paid blogger, NWPA. But maybe you are? I mean, you sure post a lot and that’s apparently all it takes to leap to that conclusion in your tiny peabrain.
And I’m very sorry that you happened to post a comment on the Trump&Patents thread just before I posted my new comment. Sometime that happens. Ask your mommy about it. Maybe she’ll even give you a lolly to s-ck on while you dry your tears.
What? No bucket for his tears? You must still be using it, eh?