Order on “In re unsealing of court records” rescinded

Patent

By Jason Rantanen

Last week the Federal Circuit issued an order relating to the unsealing of materials filed in cases docketed ten or more years ago. Misc. Docket 22-160: Is your (old) appeal on this list?

Today the court issued a new order rescinding that order as “impracticable.”

Upon further consideration of the court’s August 17, 2022 Order, the court finds it impracticable at this time to continue to proceed with the proposed unsealing of previously-identified cases. Specifically, the court finds that there will be insufficient time and considerable, unanticipated administrative difficulty to both the court and to counsel in providing an opportunity for counsel and parties in the previously-identified cases to permit a physical review of the identified cases by the National Archives and Records Administration’s December 31, 2022 deadline for the court to complete the accessioning of its remaining pa-per case records.

Instead, the court will accession the cases to the National Archives and Records Administration for permanent retention under seal.  Read the new order here: https://cafc.uscourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/22-160.pdf (Archive copy: 22-160)

Hide comments

10 thoughts on “Order on “In re unsealing of court records” rescinded”

  1. 5

    Little off topic but someone mentioned the other day wanting office personnel to explain what matter is and how it arises etc. and it turns out ol Anton did a vid on recent breakthroughs in understanding of what creates 99% of it. Or at least what it seems to be the case.

    link to youtube.com

  2. 4

    PUTTING IT BACK IN NEW BEDFORD IN THE SOUSA FAMILY WITH D. MICHAEL BURNS, RECIPROCITY, SHAREHOLDER,18 USC 249 AND 18 USC 641, PADDING THE COURT, TELLING LOFFLER YOU DO THIS AND WE’LL PROTECT YOU TOO. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.
    I KNOW trs-cdn_akm.p must be the same hacker who was earlier akami.

    1. 3.1

      I really didn’t understand that point in the Killian thread. These orders relate to whether confidential paper filings should be unsealed before they are sent to the federal document repository – not making paper records available online.

      Even if they were going to put the old paper filings online, they would have to first determine which of the confidential paper records could be unsealed. That first step is the part that is “impracticable.”

      1. 3.1.1

        If you don’t understand the point, then I doubt that you would pick up an explanation of the point.

  5. 1

    That is a relief. In my view, the original order would have created a logistical nightmare, and it raised a number of tricky ethics issues.

    1. 1.1

      SCHOONOVER WORKED FOR THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. AND CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY ARE SHAREHOLDERS. THIS IS WHY THE USPTO HID HIS PROSECUTIONS SCHOONOVER DID FOR ACUSHNET, THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY.
      THERE IS A POLITICIAN IN TN WHO AS OF TODAY IS FACING 10 YEARS IN JAIL FOR EACH CHARGE THAT I’M PRETTY SURE IS THE SAME STATUTE. YOU CAN’T WORK IN GOVERNMENT TO MAKE MONEY PRIVATELY WHILE BLOCKIN MY RIGHTS. I ZM SURE THERE ARE MORE STATUTES THAT WILL APPLY . THIS IS NOT AN ETHICS CASE. SO PUTTING WHAT YOU DID YO ME UNDER SEAL WON’T WORK. I WILL GET THROUGH TO MURDOCH. HE WILL EAT THIS CASE UP. THIS CASE HAS ALL THE SAME TRUMP CRIMES. ONLY TRUMP DIDN’T DO THIS.
      BLOCKING MY MAILING UNTIL NOVEMBER 20, 3020 IZ JUST ANOTHER CRIME REGARDING THE USPS. I’M SURE THAT DATE YOU CONTINUE TO TRY TO GET TO, WILL NOT BE A STATUTE YOU CAN HANG YOUR TROJAN HORSE ON

Comments are closed.