Tag Archives: Article III

No Concrete Plans, No Standing: Federal Circuit’s Latest on IPR Appeals

by Dennis Crouch

The recent Federal Circuit decision in Platinum Optics v. Viavi Solutions focuses attention once again on the case-and-controversy requirement derived from Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which extends federal judicial power to "Cases" and "Controversies."

The seemingly simple phrase has been the subject of extensive judicial jockeying in the development of the doctrine we know as "standing."


To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.