KSR International v. Teleflex (On Petition for Certiorari)
Strong support is beginning to mount for a small case that may have major consequences on the patent law landscape.
In a petition for a writ of certiorari, KSR has asked the Supreme Court to review the “teaching-suggestion-motivation test” for obviousness that has been a stalwart of Federal Circuit jurisprudence for twenty years. During that time, the Supreme Court has not heard a single obviousness case. Noted law professor John Duffy is on the KSR brief, which argues that the CAFC’s obviousness test goes against Supreme Court precedent, against precedent of other circuits, and is bad policy.
Now, A consortium of five major corporations, including Microsoft, Cisco, and Hallmark have filed as amicus supporting the petition. Their brief argues that the current structured test for obviousness is too easy a hurdle for patentees and that the formalities of the test undermines courts ability to truly determine whether an invention is obvious to one skilled in the art.
In addition, Teleflex has filed its opposition to the petition — arguing that (1) obviousness is well settled law and need not be revisited; (2) the CAFC’s test is consistent with Graham; and perhaps most importantly (3) this case does not hinge on the obviousness issue.
Documents:
- Party Briefs
- KSR’s Petition for Cert (Including the CAFC and District Court decisions in Appx A & B);
- Teleflex’s Brief in Opposition
- KSR Reply Brief (314 KB)
- 24 Law Professors in support of petition;
- Progress Freedom Foundation in support of petition;
- Microsoft, Cisco, Hallmark, et al. in support of petition.
Links:
Not your dads nonobviousness standard
Today, in response to the Supreme Courts invitation, the Solicitor General filed a brief expressing the views of the U.S. on the petition in KSR Intl Co. v. Teleflex Inc., S. Ct. No. 04-1350. (Copy of the brief courtesy of SCOTUSblog.) …
Is There A Patent Epidemic?
News of patent anarchy are ringing throughout the land citing the troubles with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) both for its long processing times and cries that it issues too many “unworthy” patents, which fall into the hands…
Is There A Patent Epidemic?
News of patent anarchy are ringing throughout the land citing the troubles with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) both for its long processing times and cries that it issues too many “unworthy” patents, which fall into the hands…
Why prior art doesn’t matter – combining references
Engineers and CS people often scream “I know prior art” when faced with a software patent. This post explains, from a legal perspective, why prior art rarely matters.
The main reason most prior art doesn’t actually matter is simple….
Amicus Brief in KSR v. Teleflex
An amicus brief supporting certiorari was filed Wednesday by a consortium consisting of Cisco, Microsoft, Hallmark Cards, V. F. Corporation, and Fortune Brands. UPGRADE (Mon., 6/27): Patently-O has the Teleflex brief in opposition, together with some c…
Comments are closed.