- Peter Zura
- Filewrapper.com
- Don Zuhn
- Kevin Noonan
- Stephen Albainy-Jenei
- Rand Bateman
- Steve Nipper
- Dane Carlson
- Eagle Robinson
- Patent Hawk
- KC Jones
- Gene Quinn
- USPTO’s Page on the Final Rules
[Post other relevant links in the comment section (but add substantive comments to a different post)]
That works, but only if you go to the trouble of filing an appeal brief.
David French writes:
This initiative is a continuation of the policy to cut-down multiple exchanges between examiner’s and applicants. The USPTO once allowed multiple office actions before final, a procedure which is still available in Canada. Then, in the 1960s, I believe, the USPTO adopted the policy of making a second examiner’s office action final. That is the source of the problem. The objective was to cut-off debate and force applicants to get-it-right when they respond to the first office action.
I think the answer is to file an appeal and to file a continuation at the same time. That will get the examiner’s attention and soon you will see many final office actions being withdrawn from final status.
Thanks, Anony.
BabelBoy, check the last nine pages of the 129-page pdf file linked in the Final Rule post.
Yo, can someone point me to the actual language of the new rules — as in, 37 CFR 1.75(d), 1.75(f), etc.? The Registrar appears to only give the PTO spin on the rules in 3 sections: Background, Discussion, and Comments. Where are the actual rules?
Thanks
Babel Boy
Comments are closed.