Skip to content
  • Patent Blog
  • Jobs

  • logo

  • Ethics
  • Journal

America's leading patent law source

Dependent Claim Improperly Held Obvious (When Independent is Nonobvious)

August 17, 2009Patentanticipation, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Login

About Dennis Crouch

Law Professor at the University of Missouri School of Law. View all posts by Dennis Crouch →

Post navigation

← Making a Federal Circuit Case of That? Fraud on the Patent Office: Federal Circuit Emphasizes Rule 9(b) Heightened Pleading Requirement for Defense of Inequitable Conduct →

Patently-O Authors

Dennis Crouch
Professor, University of Missouri School of Law
SSRN Articles
Follow Dennis on LinkedIn
Jason Rantanen
Professor, University of Iowa College of Law
SSRN Articles
Occasional guest posts by IP practitioners and academics

Patently-O Tools

NEW: Patently-O Paid Membership
Join thousands of patent law professionals

Manage your Account
Reset your password, Manage Subscriptions, Force logout.

Free Daily E-Mail
About 25,000 individuals now receive Patently-O via e-mail each morning.

Find a patent job
We regularly post top patent jobs from leading firms, corporations, and government and educational institutions.

Submit a patent job
Find a patent professional among the 15,000+ monthly visitors of the job board, many of whom are patent professionals at large firms and corporations.

Request a Free Membership
Students, professors, judges and their clerks, and folks making <$75k annual income all qualify.

Categories

Recent Patent Posts

  • En Banc: Lesko v. US and the Future of Agency Deference Post-Loper Bright
  • PatCon 13, April 10-12
  • Diamond Art Club Challenges USPTO’s Mass Termination of Chinese-Origin Applications in Federal Court
  • Federal Court Partially Blocks Executive Order Targeting WilmerHale: USPTO Acting Director Among Named Defendants
  • USPTO Director Takes Control of Expanded Discretionary Denials Amid PTAB Staffing Concerns
  • Statutory Text vs. Precedent: Analyzing the AIA’s On-Sale Bar for Secret Processes in Celanese v. ITC
  • Federal Circuit Redefines Prior Art Requirements Under § 102(e)/102(a)(2): In re Riggs
  • The OxyContin Conundrum: Can a Creator of Crisis Patent Its Solution?
  • Sheet Music v. Sound Waves: When Old Copyright Law Meets Modern Music
  • Prosecution Disclaimer Across Patent Family Members

Popular Tags

Abstract Idea Affirmed Without Opinion ai AIA Trials anticipation Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Claim Construction Copyright Damages design patent double patenting DTSA Enablement en banc Federal Circuit Federal Circuit En Banc First to Invent Inequitable Conduct inventorship IPR Licenses Marking motivation to combine obviousness Oil States paid patent eligibility patent infringement patent law patent litigation patent prosecution Personal Jurisdiction PGR Printed Publication PTAB reasonable expectation of success Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility Supreme Court Trademark Trade Secrets USPTO USPTO Director Venue Written Description

Archives

Contact Us

  • E-mail Dennis Crouch
  • E-mail Patently-O Jobs
  • Submit a Job Listing