Skip to content
  • Patent Blog
  • Jobs

  • logo

  • Ethics
  • Journal

America's leading patent law source

Procedure: Expert Testimony Deserves Weight on Summary Judgment

June 19, 2007Obviousness, Patent, Patent Cases 2007, Summary Judgmentobviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Login

About Dennis Crouch

Law Professor at the University of Missouri School of Law. View all posts by Dennis Crouch →

Post navigation

← Means-Plus-Function Element Found Indefinite Without Corresponding Structure Patent Reform: Changes to Continuation and Claiming Practice →

Patently-O Authors

Dennis Crouch
Professor, University of Missouri School of Law
SSRN Articles
Follow Dennis on LinkedIn
Jason Rantanen
Professor, University of Iowa College of Law
SSRN Articles
Occasional guest posts by IP practitioners and academics

Patently-O Tools

NEW: Patently-O Paid Membership
Join thousands of patent law professionals

Manage your Account
Reset your password, Manage Subscriptions, Force logout.

Free Daily E-Mail
About 25,000 individuals now receive Patently-O via e-mail each morning.

Find a patent job
We regularly post top patent jobs from leading firms, corporations, and government and educational institutions.

Submit a patent job
Find a patent professional among the 15,000+ monthly visitors of the job board, many of whom are patent professionals at large firms and corporations.

Request a Free Membership
Students, professors, judges and their clerks, and folks making <$75k annual income all qualify.

Categories

Recent Patent Posts

  • “Do it on AI” claims are Abstract Ideas
  • I Know I’m Going to Love a Brief That Repeatedly Cites Marbury v. Madison
  • Patent Issuance Timeline Accelerated
  • PHOSITA is no Ordinary Person
  • Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk Call for Abolition of “All IP Law”
  • Silicon Valley Judicial Ties: The Cellspin Recusal Case
  • Judge Shopping vs. Judge Dodging: Federal Circuit Denies SAP’s Transfer Request
  • When Five Years of Use Isn’t Enough: The High Bar for Highly Descriptive Marks
  • Non-Tariff Countermeasures to U.S. Tariff Hikes: IP, Services, and Investment Implications
  • Federal Circuit on Trade Secret Remedies in AMS-OSRAM v. Renesas

Popular Tags

Abstract Idea Affirmed Without Opinion ai AIA Trials anticipation Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Claim Construction Copyright Damages design patent double patenting DTSA Enablement en banc Federal Circuit Federal Circuit En Banc First to Invent Inequitable Conduct inventorship IPR Licenses Marking motivation to combine obviousness Oil States paid patent eligibility patent infringement patent law patent litigation patent prosecution Personal Jurisdiction PGR Printed Publication PTAB reasonable expectation of success Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility Supreme Court Trademark Trade Secrets USPTO USPTO Director Venue Written Description

Archives

Contact Us

  • E-mail Dennis Crouch
  • E-mail Patently-O Jobs
  • Submit a Job Listing