“artificial general intelligence (AGI) remains theoretical”
This should be a required footnote to just above every news discussion.
1.1
This should be a required footnote to just above every news discussion of AI.
*sigh*
1.2
IF you ASSume that such is correct.
That is actually one of the points FOR discussion.
And just to be clear – this is NOT a call for recognition that the event of the Singularity has been reached. The technical point being viewed is NOT nearly as eventful as the Singularity.
1.2.1
“this is NOT a call for recognition that the event of the Singularity has been reached.”
I disagree. How could you think such a thing?
1.2.1.1
Easily.
That you might disagree is your prerogative.
1.3
When an artificial intelligence destroys the world, it won’t be a AGI like Skynet, it will be an AI engineered to run a paperclip factory.
“artificial general intelligence (AGI) remains theoretical”
This should be a required footnote to just above every news discussion.
This should be a required footnote to just above every news discussion of AI.
*sigh*
IF you ASSume that such is correct.
That is actually one of the points FOR discussion.
And just to be clear – this is NOT a call for recognition that the event of the Singularity has been reached. The technical point being viewed is NOT nearly as eventful as the Singularity.
“this is NOT a call for recognition that the event of the Singularity has been reached.”
I disagree. How could you think such a thing?
Easily.
That you might disagree is your prerogative.
When an artificial intelligence destroys the world, it won’t be a AGI like Skynet, it will be an AI engineered to run a paperclip factory.
Comments are closed.