Skip to content
  • Patent Blog
  • Jobs

  • logo

  • Ethics
  • Journal

America's leading patent law source

Obviousness: Claim Construction (Q.of.Law) vs. Interpretation of the Prior Art (Q.of.Fact)

November 24, 2020PatentClaim Construction, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Login

About Dennis Crouch

Law Professor at the University of Missouri School of Law. View all posts by Dennis Crouch →

Post navigation

← For Better or Worse: A time for Family Patently-O Bits and Bytes by Juvan Bonni →

Patently-O Authors

Dennis Crouch
Professor, University of Missouri School of Law
SSRN Articles
Follow Dennis on LinkedIn
Jason Rantanen
Professor, University of Iowa College of Law
SSRN Articles
Occasional guest posts by IP practitioners and academics

Patently-O Tools

NEW: Patently-O Paid Membership
Join thousands of patent law professionals

Manage your Account
Reset your password, Manage Subscriptions, Force logout.

Free Daily E-Mail
About 25,000 individuals now receive Patently-O via e-mail each morning.

Find a patent job
We regularly post top patent jobs from leading firms, corporations, and government and educational institutions.

Submit a patent job
Find a patent professional among the 15,000+ monthly visitors of the job board, many of whom are patent professionals at large firms and corporations.

Request a Free Membership
Students, professors, judges and their clerks, and folks making <$75k annual income all qualify.

Categories

Recent Patent Posts

  • Statutory Text vs. Precedent: Analyzing the AIA’s On-Sale Bar for Secret Processes in Celanese v. ITC
  • Federal Circuit Redefines Prior Art Requirements Under ยง 102(e)/102(a)(2): In re Riggs
  • The OxyContin Conundrum: Can a Creator of Crisis Patent Its Solution?
  • Sheet Music v. Sound Waves: When Old Copyright Law Meets Modern Music
  • Prosecution Disclaimer Across Patent Family Members
  • Tax Victory for Generic Drug Companies: Federal Circuit Affirms ANDA Litigation Expenses are Deductible
  • New PTAB Informative Decision Demands MPF Construction and Parallel Litigation Consistency
  • Narrowly Broad: The Federal Circuit’s Improper Expansion of Unreviewable Agency Discretion
  • Guest Post by Profs. Masur & Ouellette: Patent Disclosure and After-Arising Technologies
  • Secretary of Commerce Clears House at USPTO Advisory Committees

Popular Tags

Abstract Idea Affirmed Without Opinion ai AIA Trials anticipation Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Claim Construction Copyright Damages design patent double patenting DTSA Enablement en banc Federal Circuit Federal Circuit En Banc First to Invent Inequitable Conduct inventorship IPR Licenses Marking motivation to combine obviousness Oil States paid patent eligibility patent infringement patent law patent litigation patent prosecution Personal Jurisdiction PGR Printed Publication PTAB reasonable expectation of success Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility Supreme Court Trademark Trade Secrets USPTO USPTO Director Venue Written Description

Archives

Contact Us

  • E-mail Dennis Crouch
  • E-mail Patently-O Jobs
  • Submit a Job Listing