Skip to content
  • Patent Blog
  • Jobs
  • logo

  • Ethics
  • Journal

America's leading patent law source

Effect of a Stipulated Dismissal

June 26, 2009Patent, Patent Cases 2009paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patently-O Authors

Dennis Crouch
Associate Professor, University of Missouri School of Law
SSRN Articles
Jason Rantanen
Professor, University of Iowa College of Law
SSRN Articles
Occasional guest posts by IP practitioners and academics

Evidence Based Prosecution: The Status of Applications Filed 4 ½ Years Ago

June 25, 2009Academic Studies, Articles and Publications, BPAI, PatentpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Evidence Based Prosecution: The Status of Applications Filed 4 ½ Years Ago

June 25, 2009Academic Studies, Articles and Publications, BPAI, PatentpaidJonathan Hummel

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Evidence Based Prosecution: The Status of Applications Filed 4 ½ Years Ago

June 25, 2009Academic Studies, Articles and Publications, BPAIpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Timeline of the BPAI Backlog

June 25, 2009BPAI, PatentpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Bits and Bytes No 120: In the News

June 25, 2009Bits and Bytes, PatentMarking, paid, USPTO DirectorDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 119

June 23, 2009Bits and Bytes, PatentLicenses, Marking, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 119

June 23, 2009Bits and Bytes, PatentLicenses, Marking, paidJonathan Hummel

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 119

June 23, 2009Bits and BytesLicenses, Marking, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Understanding the Role of the Board of Patent Appeals: Ex Parte Rejection Rates on Appeal

June 22, 2009Academic Studies, Articles and Publications, BPAI, Patentanticipation, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Bits and Bytes No. 118: Kappos & Dudas

June 21, 2009Bits and Bytes, Patentpaid, USPTO DirectorDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Understanding the Role of the Board of Patent Appeals: Ex Parte Rejection Rates on Appeal

June 19, 2009BPAI, PatentAffirmed Without Opinion, anticipation, Claim Construction, Enablement, obviousness, paid, Venue, Written DescriptionDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Preliminary Injunctions and Obviousness in Design Patent Law

June 17, 2009Design Patent, Injunctions, Patent, Patent Cases 2009Licenses, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Appealing BPAI Rejections to the Federal Circuit

June 16, 2009BPAI, Obviousness, Patent, Patent Cases 2009obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Bits and Bytes No. 117: Data, Damages & Deferred Examination

June 14, 2009Bits and Bytes, PatentDamages, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Bits and Bytes No. 117: Data, Damages & Deferred Examination

June 14, 2009Bits and Bytes, PatentDamages, paidJonathan Hummel

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Bits and Bytes No. 117: Data, Damages & Deferred Examination

June 14, 2009Bits and BytesDamages, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

BPAI Backlog

June 11, 2009BPAI, Patent, TipCastpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Lack of Standing: Dismiss with(out) prejudice

June 10, 2009Patent, Patent Cases 2009paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Court Costs: $1,000,000 in Translation Costs Awarded to Prevailing Party

June 10, 2009Damages, Patent, Patent Cases 2009paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Posts navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Patently-O Authors

Dennis Crouch
Professor, University of Missouri School of Law
SSRN Articles
Follow Dennis on LinkedIn
Jason Rantanen
Professor, University of Iowa College of Law
SSRN Articles
Occasional guest posts by IP practitioners and academics

Patently-O Tools

NEW: Patently-O Paid Membership
Join thousands of patent law professionals

Manage your Account
Reset your password, Manage Subscriptions, Force logout.

Free Daily E-Mail
About 25,000 individuals now receive Patently-O via e-mail each morning.

Find a patent job
We regularly post top patent jobs from leading firms, corporations, and government and educational institutions.

Submit a patent job
Find a patent professional among the 15,000+ monthly visitors of the job board, many of whom are patent professionals at large firms and corporations.

Request a Free Membership
Students, professors, judges and their clerks, and folks making <$75k annual income all qualify.

Categories

Recent Patent Posts

  • Reference Recycling and the Case for Sua Sponte Rehearing in Ingenico
  • Federal Circuit Affirms Trademark Refusal for “US SPACE FORCE” Mark
  • Throwing Out the Jury: How the Federal Circuit’s ‘Particularized Testimony’ Rule Further Threatens the Doctrine of Equivalents
  • Estoppel Gutted: A Pelican’s Guide to Patent Litigation
  • Clinical Trials Get a Legal Shield: Federal Circuit Reverses Pharma Patent Injunction
  • The Federal Circuit’s Rigid Approach to Secondary Considerations
  • Legacy of In re Rijckaert: Inherency’s Limited Role in Obviousness Analysis
  • AI and Cognitive Laziness for Lawyers
  • By all Means: When Software Functions Lack Correspnding Structure
  • Color Mark Denial on Dark Green Medical Gloves

Popular Tags

Abstract Idea Affirmed Without Opinion ai AIA Trials anticipation Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Claim Construction Copyright Damages design patent double patenting DTSA Enablement en banc Federal Circuit Federal Circuit En Banc First to Invent Inequitable Conduct inventorship IPR Licenses Marking motivation to combine obviousness Oil States paid patent eligibility patent infringement patent law patent litigation patent prosecution Personal Jurisdiction PGR Printed Publication PTAB reasonable expectation of success Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility Supreme Court Trademark Trade Secrets USPTO USPTO Director Venue Written Description

Archives

Contact Us

  • E-mail Dennis Crouch
  • E-mail Patently-O Jobs
  • Submit a Job Listing