Skip to content
  • Patent Blog
  • Jobs
  • logo

  • Ethics
  • Journal

America's leading patent law source

Patently-O Bits & Bytes by Lawrence Higgins

November 8, 2011Bits and Bytes, Design Patent, PatentEnablement, paid, USPTO DirectorDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patently-O Authors

Dennis Crouch
Associate Professor, University of Missouri School of Law
SSRN Articles
Jason Rantanen
Professor, University of Iowa College of Law
SSRN Articles
Occasional guest posts by IP practitioners and academics

Patently-O Bits & Bytes by Lawrence Higgins

November 8, 2011Bits and Bytes, Design PatentEnablement, paid, USPTO DirectorJason Rantanen

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patently-O Bits & Bytes by Lawrence Higgins

November 8, 2011Bits and Bytes, Design Patent, PatentEnablement, paid, USPTO DirectorLawrence Higgins

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Guest Post: Industrial Designs – the Wonder Weapon for the German Blitzkrieg?

October 13, 2011Design Patent, Guest Post, PatentDamages, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

October 5, 2011Design Patent, PatentFirst to Invent, paid, USPTO DirectorDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Design Patents and the Fashion Industry

December 6, 2010Copyright, Design Patent, Patentanticipation, design patent, First to Invent, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

A Trademark Justification for Design Patent Rights

August 11, 2010Articles and Publications, Design Patent, Patent, Trademarkdesign patent, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Design Patent Rejections

January 19, 2010Academic Studies, Design Patent, Patentanticipation, design patent, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Design Law: Protecting Copyrighted Designs

December 2, 2009Design Patent, Patent, Patent Cases 2009Copyright, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Design Patents: Mueller & Brean

November 17, 2009Academic Studies, Articles and Publications, Design Patent, Patentanticipation, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Design Patents: Functionality and a Trade Dress Gap Filler

November 16, 2009Design Patent, PatentpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Google’s Patent on its GOOGLE.COM Home Page

September 3, 2009Design Patent, Patentanticipation, Inequitable Conduct, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Preliminary Injunctions and Obviousness in Design Patent Law

June 17, 2009Design Patent, Injunctions, Patent, Patent Cases 2009Licenses, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Bits and Bytes No. 116

June 8, 2009Bits and Bytes, Damages, Design Patent, License, USPTO NewspaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patents and the Auto Industry Bailout

April 5, 2009Design Patent, Patentpaid, USPTO DirectorDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Design Patents: Sailing Through the PTO

April 2, 2009Academic Studies, Articles and Publications, Design Patent, Patent, Patent ProsecutionpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Protecting Design Patents on Shoes

October 16, 2008Design Patent, PatentMarking, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

En Banc Federal Circuit Revives Design Patent Law

September 22, 2008Design Patent, En Banc, Patent, Patent Cases 2008Claim Construction, Federal Circuit En Banc, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Microsoft’s Patenting Trend

June 24, 2008Bits and Bytes, Design Patent, PatentpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Auto Parts Design

June 8, 2008Design Patent, PatentFederal Circuit En Banc, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Posts navigation

← Older posts

Patently-O Authors

Dennis Crouch
Professor, University of Missouri School of Law
SSRN Articles
Follow Dennis on LinkedIn
Jason Rantanen
Professor, University of Iowa College of Law
SSRN Articles
Occasional guest posts by IP practitioners and academics

Patently-O Tools

NEW: Patently-O Paid Membership
Join thousands of patent law professionals

Manage your Account
Reset your password, Manage Subscriptions, Force logout.

Free Daily E-Mail
About 25,000 individuals now receive Patently-O via e-mail each morning.

Find a patent job
We regularly post top patent jobs from leading firms, corporations, and government and educational institutions.

Submit a patent job
Find a patent professional among the 15,000+ monthly visitors of the job board, many of whom are patent professionals at large firms and corporations.

Request a Free Membership
Students, professors, judges and their clerks, and folks making <$75k annual income all qualify.

Categories

Recent Patent Posts

  • Rapunzel, Rapunzel, Let Down Your Generic Hair (and Let Us In)!
  • The Remedies Remedy is Almost Complete: EcoFactor v. Google
  • Federal Circuit Confronts “Divide and Conquer” Briefing Strategy in Patent Appeal
  • An IDS is Now the Best Defense Against IPRs: Ecto World v. RAI
  • Thin Ice That Held: Samsung’s IPR Strategy Survived Scrutiny at the Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit on Negative Limitations and Secondary Considerations
  • Jurisdictional Boundaries in Patent Licensing Disputes: Misuse Counterclaim Creates CAFC Jurisdiction
  • Formalism, Fictions, and Federalism: Post Expiry Royalties Return to SCOTUS
  • The Standard for Conception: Don’t Ask “Will it Work”
  • Transformative Changes: Copyright Leadership Dismissed as AI Report Questions Industry Practices

Popular Tags

Abstract Idea Affirmed Without Opinion ai AIA Trials anticipation Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Claim Construction Copyright Damages design patent double patenting DTSA Enablement en banc Federal Circuit Federal Circuit En Banc First to Invent Inequitable Conduct inventorship IPR Licenses Marking motivation to combine obviousness Oil States paid patent eligibility patent infringement patent law patent litigation patent prosecution Personal Jurisdiction PGR Printed Publication PTAB reasonable expectation of success Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility Supreme Court Trademark Trade Secrets USPTO USPTO Director Venue Written Description

Archives

Contact Us

  • E-mail Dennis Crouch
  • E-mail Patently-O Jobs
  • Submit a Job Listing