Skip to content
  • Patent Blog
  • Jobs
  • logo

  • Ethics
  • Journal

America's leading patent law source

Double Patenting: Proving Distinctiveness Based on Later Developed Evidence

April 16, 2009Patent, Patent Cases 2009obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patently-O Authors

Dennis Crouch
Associate Professor, University of Missouri School of Law
SSRN Articles
Jason Rantanen
Professor, University of Iowa College of Law
SSRN Articles
Occasional guest posts by IP practitioners and academics

Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 103: Events and Jobs

April 15, 2009Bits and Bytes, PatentEnablement, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Challenging the Strong Presumption of Patent Validity

April 15, 2009Academic Studies, Articles and Publications, Invalidity, PatentAIA Trials, paid, PGRDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

In re Ferguson (Answers to Frequently Asked Questions FAQ)

April 15, 2009Articles and Publications, Patent, Patent Cases 2009anticipation, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patents Exhausted by Sale after Covenant Not to Sue

April 14, 2009PatentLicenses, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patent Reform: First to File

April 9, 2009PatentEnablement, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Bits and Bytes No. 102

April 8, 2009Patentpaid, USPTO DirectorDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Bits and Bytes No. 102

April 8, 2009Patentpaid, USPTO DirectorJonathan Hummel

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Bits and Bytes No. 102

April 8, 2009Patentpaid, USPTO DirectorDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Law Student Interns at PTO

April 8, 2009PatentpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Written Description: Pioneering Claims Require More Expansive Written Description

April 8, 2009Patentanticipation, Claim Construction, Enablement, obviousness, paid, Written DescriptionDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

In re Kubin: Federal Circuit Expands Obvious-to-Try Jurisprudence

April 7, 2009Patentanticipation, Enablement, obviousness, paid, reasonable expectation of successDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patents and the Auto Industry Bailout

April 5, 2009Design Patent, Patentpaid, USPTO DirectorDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Percentage of Patents that were Initially Rejected

April 3, 2009Academic Studies, Articles and Publications, Patent, Patent ProsecutionpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

In re Gleave: Reference with Unknown Utility Still Anticipates

April 3, 2009Fees, Guest Post, Interference, ITC, Law Firm Practice, Patent, Post Grant Review, Trade Secretanticipation, Enablement, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Design Patents: Sailing Through the PTO

April 2, 2009Academic Studies, Articles and Publications, Design Patent, Patent, Patent ProsecutionpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Guest Post: Ten Reasons the Supreme Court Should Take In re Bilski

April 1, 2009PatentFederal Circuit En Banc, paid, Supreme CourtDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Bits and Bytes No. 101: Patent Bill & the Patent Lobby

March 31, 2009PatentAIA Trials, Claim Construction, IPR, paid, PGR, VenueDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Innovation in the 21st Century: Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law

March 30, 2009PatentpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

No Stay of District Court Proceedings Pending Appeal of Preliminary Injunction

March 29, 2009Injunctions, License, Patent, Patent Cases 2009, TransnationalLicenses, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Posts navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Patently-O Authors

Dennis Crouch
Professor, University of Missouri School of Law
SSRN Articles
Follow Dennis on LinkedIn
Jason Rantanen
Professor, University of Iowa College of Law
SSRN Articles
Occasional guest posts by IP practitioners and academics

Patently-O Tools

NEW: Patently-O Paid Membership
Join thousands of patent law professionals

Manage your Account
Reset your password, Manage Subscriptions, Force logout.

Free Daily E-Mail
About 25,000 individuals now receive Patently-O via e-mail each morning.

Find a patent job
We regularly post top patent jobs from leading firms, corporations, and government and educational institutions.

Submit a patent job
Find a patent professional among the 15,000+ monthly visitors of the job board, many of whom are patent professionals at large firms and corporations.

Request a Free Membership
Students, professors, judges and their clerks, and folks making <$75k annual income all qualify.

Categories

Recent Patent Posts

  • Federal Circuit Wrestles with Prosecution Laches in Sonos v. Google
  • Motorola Follows SAP with Mandamus Challenge to Acting Director Stewart’s IPR Policy Reversal
  • Google v. Sonos: Oral Arguments
  • Overlapping Ranges and the Presumption of Obviousness
  • Prior Art Document vs. Prior Art Process: How Lynk Labs Exposes a Fundamental Ambiguity in Patent Law
  • Corcept v. Teva Oral Argument: Infringement by Drug Label, Again
  • Quick Post on Egenera
  • Back to 1789: How Founding-Era Equity Could Resurrect NPE Injunctions
  • PTAB’s New “Settled Expectations” Doctrine
  • SAP’s Mandamus Petition Challenging Trump Admin’s Discretionary Denial Policy Shift

Popular Tags

Abstract Idea Affirmed Without Opinion ai AIA Trials anticipation Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Claim Construction Copyright Damages design patent double patenting DTSA Enablement en banc Federal Circuit Federal Circuit En Banc First to Invent Inequitable Conduct inventorship IPR Licenses Marking motivation to combine obviousness Oil States paid patent eligibility patent infringement patent law patent litigation patent prosecution Personal Jurisdiction PGR Printed Publication PTAB reasonable expectation of success Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility Supreme Court Trademark Trade Secrets USPTO USPTO Director Venue Written Description

Archives

Contact Us

  • E-mail Dennis Crouch
  • E-mail Patently-O Jobs
  • Submit a Job Listing

Register