Brilliant New Book on Ethics in Prosecution 2015 Edition Out Now! December 1, 2014Attorney Fees, Best Mode, Book Review, Books, conflict of interest, Enablement, Ethics, Fee Shifting, Fees, Inequitable Conduct, Invalidity, Inventorship, Law Firm Practice, Local Rules, Patent, Patent Prosecution, Procedure, PTAB, Work - Patent Agent, Work - Patent Litigation, Work - Patent ProsecutionFirst to Invent, paidDavid To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Case dismissed as sanction for misrepresentations August 29, 2014- US - Southwest, Attorney Fees, District Court, Ethics, Fee Shifting, Fees, Patent, Patent Cases 2014Inequitable Conduct, paidDavid To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
iLOR v. Google: Rejected Claim Construction Does Not Render Case “Objectively Baseless” January 12, 2011Attorney Fees, CAFC, Claim Construction, Fees, Infringement, Injunctions, PatentClaim Construction, Federal Circuit En Banc, obviousness, paidJason Rantanen To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Michel & Nothhaft: Inventing Our Way Out of Joblessness August 6, 2010Articles and Publications, Fees, PatentEnablement, paid, VenueDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
In re Gleave: Reference with Unknown Utility Still Anticipates April 3, 2009Fees, Guest Post, Interference, ITC, Law Firm Practice, Patent, Post Grant Review, Trade Secretanticipation, Enablement, paidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.