Another Prosecution Bar Case, but With a Twist October 17, 2014Ethics, Patent, ReexaminationpaidDavid To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Update on Supplemental Examination November 30, 2012Patent, ReexaminationpaidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Harvard’s US OncoMouse Patents are All Expired (For the Time Being) September 18, 2012Disclaimer, District Court, Medical Device, Patent, Patent Cases 2012, Patent Term Extension, Petitions, Post Grant Review, Priority Rights, Reexaminationdouble patenting, Licenses, paidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Stay Pending Reissue: Timing and Blog Reliability October 10, 2011Patent, Patent Cases 2011, Reexamination, ReissueClaim Construction, paid, USPTO DirectorDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
No Litigation Estoppel until All Appeals Exhausted in Inter Partes Reexamination October 3, 2011BPAI, Patent, Patent Cases 2011, Reexaminationanticipation, Claim Construction, paidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
In re Glatt Air Techniques, Inc.: Single Embodiment Commercial Success January 6, 2011CAFC, Obviousness, Patent, Pharma, Rantanen, Reexaminationobviousness, paidJason Rantanen To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Untouchable: Sham Reexamination Requests November 15, 2010Amicus Brief, Patent, Reexaminationobviousness, paidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Sham Reexamination Requests and Federal Preemption November 10, 2010Patent, ReexaminationInequitable Conduct, paidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Bits and Bytes No. 136 October 28, 2009Bits and Bytes, Patent, ReexaminationpaidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Cooper Cameron: First Inter Partes Reexam Appeal to the Federal Circuit August 4, 2009Patent, Patent Cases 2009, ReexaminationpaidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Requester Success Rates In Inter Partes Reexamination July 28, 2009Patent, Reexaminationobviousness, paidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Mexican Yellow Bean Patent Finally Cooked July 10, 2009Patent, Patent Cases 2009, Reexaminationobviousness, paidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
OVERVIEW OF USPTO PROCEEDINGS FOR THE REEXAMINATION OF A U.S. PATENT July 8, 2009Patent, ReexaminationBroadest Reasonable Interpretation, Claim Construction, Federal Circuit En Banc, paid, Printed PublicationDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Inter Partes Reexamination Statistics July 7, 2009Academic Studies, Articles and Publications, Patent, ReexaminationpaidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Guest Post: Hot Topics in US Patent Reexamination March 10, 2009Academic Studies, Articles and Publications, Guest Post, Patent, ReexaminationAIA Trials, IPR, paid, PGR, USPTO DirectorDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Stays Pending Inter Partes Reexamination March 8, 2009Articles and Publications, Patent, ReexaminationpaidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Patent Reform Act of 2009 March 3, 2009Damages, Patent, Patent Legislation, ReexaminationAIA Trials, Claim Construction, Inequitable Conduct, IPR, obviousness, paid, PGR, VenueDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 93 March 2, 2009Bits and Bytes, Conference or CLE, Patent, ReexaminationpaidJonathan Hummel To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 93 March 2, 2009Bits and Bytes, Conference or CLE, ReexaminationpaidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.
Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 93 March 2, 2009Bits and Bytes, Conference or CLE, Patent, ReexaminationpaidDennis Crouch To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.