Skip to content
  • Patent Blog
  • Jobs
  • logo

  • Ethics
  • Journal

America's leading patent law source

Patently-O Bits & Bytes by Lawrence Higgins

February 28, 2012PatentClaim Construction, Damages, double patenting, obviousness, paidLawrence Higgins

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patently-O Authors

Dennis Crouch
Associate Professor, University of Missouri School of Law
SSRN Articles
Jason Rantanen
Professor, University of Iowa College of Law
SSRN Articles
Occasional guest posts by IP practitioners and academics

Patently-O Bits & Bytes by Lawrence Higgins

February 28, 2012PatentClaim Construction, Damages, double patenting, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Bar to Courts: Please Define “Unpatentably Abstract”

February 27, 2012PatentAbstract Idea, Enablement, paid, Subject Matter EligibilityDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Does Agency Funding Affect the PTO’s Decisionmaking?

February 27, 2012PatentpaidJason Rantanen

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Political Candidates Sued for Patent Infringement

February 27, 2012PatentLicenses, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

New IP Hall of Fame Members

February 24, 2012Patentpaid, USPTO DirectorDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Mettler-Toledo v. B-Tek: Limiting Claim Elements to the Preferred Embodiment

February 23, 2012PatentClaim Construction, Damages, obviousness, paid, USPTO DirectorJason Rantanen

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Federal Circuit: COACH not a sufficiently famous brand and therefore cannot oppose a similar mark on a trademark dilution principle.

February 23, 2012Patentpaid, VenueDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Suffolk Law Event

February 22, 2012PatentpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

February 21, 2012Patentpaid, USPTO DirectorDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Supreme Court: No Move Yet on Denying Human Gene Patents

February 21, 2012Patentpaid, Supreme Court, Written DescriptionDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

APPLE V MOTOROLA in the EPO and Germany – patentability of user interface features

February 21, 2012PatentAffirmed Without Opinion, anticipation, First to Invent, obviousness, paid, Written DescriptionDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Whither Obviousness: Narrow Range Anticipated by Broader Range in Disclosure

February 20, 2012Anticipation, Articles and Publications, Obviousness, PatentAffirmed Without Opinion, anticipation, Enablement, obviousness, paid, Trade SecretsDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

USPTO Maintenance Fees

February 20, 2012Academic Studies, Articles and Publications, Patentpaid, VenueDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patently-O Bits & Bytes by Lawrence Higgins

February 20, 2012Bits and Bytes, PatentAIA Trials, Claim Construction, Inequitable Conduct, IPR, obviousness, paid, PGRLawrence Higgins

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patently-O Bits & Bytes by Lawrence Higgins

February 20, 2012Bits and Bytes, PatentAIA Trials, Claim Construction, Inequitable Conduct, IPR, obviousness, paid, PGRDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Predicting Patent Litigation – A Response by Professor Chien

February 16, 2012Patentpaid, VenueJason Rantanen

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

The Unpredictability of Patent Litigation

February 16, 2012PatentpaidJason Rantanen

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

February 15, 2012Bits and Bytes, Conference or CLE, PatentpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

BPAI On Statutory Subject Matter

February 14, 2012PatentAbstract Idea, paid, Subject Matter EligibilityDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Posts navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Patently-O Authors

Dennis Crouch
Professor, University of Missouri School of Law
SSRN Articles
Follow Dennis on LinkedIn
Jason Rantanen
Professor, University of Iowa College of Law
SSRN Articles
Occasional guest posts by IP practitioners and academics

Patently-O Tools

NEW: Patently-O Paid Membership
Join thousands of patent law professionals

Manage your Account
Reset your password, Manage Subscriptions, Force logout.

Free Daily E-Mail
About 25,000 individuals now receive Patently-O via e-mail each morning.

Find a patent job
We regularly post top patent jobs from leading firms, corporations, and government and educational institutions.

Submit a patent job
Find a patent professional among the 15,000+ monthly visitors of the job board, many of whom are patent professionals at large firms and corporations.

Request a Free Membership
Students, professors, judges and their clerks, and folks making <$75k annual income all qualify.

Categories

Recent Patent Posts

  • Corcept v. Teva Oral Argument: Infringement by Drug Label, Again
  • Quick Post on Egenera
  • Back to 1789: How Founding-Era Equity Could Resurrect NPE Injunctions
  • PTAB’s New “Settled Expectations” Doctrine
  • SAP’s Mandamus Petition Challenging Trump Admin’s Discretionary Denial Policy Shift
  • Supreme Court Grants Cert in First (and only) IP Case of 2024: Billion-Dollar ISP Copyright Contributory Liability Case
  • Eye Therapies v. Slayback: Federal Circuit Abandons Standard Transition Construction
  • Hedging on Claim Construction: USPTO Says Keep It to One IPR Petition
  • USPTO Updates for 2025 – Free Webinar
  • Preview: Federal Circuit Oral Argument in Google v. Sonos (July 10, 2025)

Popular Tags

Abstract Idea Affirmed Without Opinion ai AIA Trials anticipation Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Claim Construction Copyright Damages design patent double patenting DTSA Enablement en banc Federal Circuit Federal Circuit En Banc First to Invent Inequitable Conduct inventorship IPR Licenses Marking motivation to combine obviousness Oil States paid patent eligibility patent infringement patent law patent litigation patent prosecution Personal Jurisdiction PGR Printed Publication PTAB reasonable expectation of success Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility Supreme Court Trademark Trade Secrets USPTO USPTO Director Venue Written Description

Archives

Contact Us

  • E-mail Dennis Crouch
  • E-mail Patently-O Jobs
  • Submit a Job Listing

Register