Skip to content
  • Patent Blog
  • Jobs
  • logo

  • Ethics
  • Journal

America's leading patent law source

Bits and Bytes No. 117: Data, Damages & Deferred Examination

June 14, 2009Bits and Bytes, PatentDamages, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patently-O Authors

Dennis Crouch
Associate Professor, University of Missouri School of Law
SSRN Articles
Jason Rantanen
Professor, University of Iowa College of Law
SSRN Articles
Occasional guest posts by IP practitioners and academics

Bits and Bytes No. 117: Data, Damages & Deferred Examination

June 14, 2009Bits and Bytes, PatentDamages, paidJonathan Hummel

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Bits and Bytes No. 117: Data, Damages & Deferred Examination

June 14, 2009Bits and BytesDamages, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

BPAI Backlog

June 11, 2009BPAI, Patent, TipCastpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Lack of Standing: Dismiss with(out) prejudice

June 10, 2009Patent, Patent Cases 2009paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Court Costs: $1,000,000 in Translation Costs Awarded to Prevailing Party

June 10, 2009Damages, Patent, Patent Cases 2009paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Injunctive Relief: District Court Abused Discretion by Failing to Consider eBay Factors

June 9, 2009Injunctions, Patent, Patent Cases 2009paid, Supreme CourtDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Bits and Bytes No. 116

June 8, 2009Bits and Bytes, Damages, Design Patent, License, USPTO NewspaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Written Description: Araid Petitions en banc Federal Circuit to Eliminate Separate Written Description Requirement

June 7, 2009En Banc, Enablement, Patent, Patent Cases 2009Enablement, Federal Circuit En Banc, paid, Written DescriptionDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Tafas v. Doll (En Banc Suggestion)

June 5, 2009En Banc, Patent, Patent Cases 2009Federal Circuit En Banc, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Fractured Claim Construction

June 5, 2009Claim Construction, Interference, Patent, Patent Cases 2009anticipation, Broadest Reasonable Interpretation, Claim Construction, obviousness, paid, Written DescriptionDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Bits and Bytes No. 115

June 3, 2009Bits and Bytes, Claim Drafting Tips, USPTO NewspaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Appealing BPAI Rejections: Part I

June 2, 2009Academic Studies, Articles and Publications, BPAI, Dissent, PatentFederal Circuit En Banc, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Survey: Swearing behind prior art

June 2, 2009Articles and Publications, Bits and Bytes, PatentpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Google Friend Connect

May 28, 2009PatentpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Bits and Bytes No. 113: PTO Director

May 28, 2009Bits and Bytes, USPTO NewsMarking, paid, USPTO DirectorDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Discovery Misconduct

May 28, 2009Patent, Patent Cases 2009Affirmed Without Opinion, Claim Construction, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 112: Legally Drawn

May 28, 2009Bits and Bytes, PatentpaidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Paragon v. Timex: Claims with Contextual Limitations

May 28, 2009Claim Construction, Patent, Patent Cases 2009Claim Construction, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Declaratory Judgment: Personal Jurisdiction over Foreign Patent Holder

May 27, 2009Declaratory Judgment, Patent, Patent Cases 2009, TransnationalLicenses, paid, Personal JurisdictionDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Posts navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Patently-O Authors

Dennis Crouch
Professor, University of Missouri School of Law
SSRN Articles
Follow Dennis on LinkedIn
Jason Rantanen
Professor, University of Iowa College of Law
SSRN Articles
Occasional guest posts by IP practitioners and academics

Patently-O Tools

NEW: Patently-O Paid Membership
Join thousands of patent law professionals

Manage your Account
Reset your password, Manage Subscriptions, Force logout.

Free Daily E-Mail
About 25,000 individuals now receive Patently-O via e-mail each morning.

Find a patent job
We regularly post top patent jobs from leading firms, corporations, and government and educational institutions.

Submit a patent job
Find a patent professional among the 15,000+ monthly visitors of the job board, many of whom are patent professionals at large firms and corporations.

Request a Free Membership
Students, professors, judges and their clerks, and folks making <$75k annual income all qualify.

Categories

Recent Patent Posts

  • Eye Therapies v. Slayback: Federal Circuit Abandons Standard Transition Construction
  • Hedging on Claim Construction: USPTO Says Keep It to One IPR Petition
  • USPTO Updates for 2025 – Free Webinar
  • Preview: Federal Circuit Oral Argument in Google v. Sonos (July 10, 2025)
  • U.S. Government: NPEs Deserve Injunctive Relief when their Patents Are Infringed
  • Seeds of Doubt: Sexual Reproduction and Territorial Limits in Plant Patent Law
  • USPTO Implements Penalty System for False Small/Micro Entity Status Claims
  • Label-Plus Infringement: The Tinderbox Theory of Generic Inducement
  • USPTO Discontinues Accelerated Examination Program for Utility Applications (Design Patent Rocket Docket is also Suspended)
  • Prosecution Laches from Woodbridge to Sonos: A 170-Year Continuation?

Popular Tags

Abstract Idea Affirmed Without Opinion ai AIA Trials anticipation Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Claim Construction Copyright Damages design patent double patenting DTSA Enablement en banc Federal Circuit Federal Circuit En Banc First to Invent Inequitable Conduct inventorship IPR Licenses Marking motivation to combine obviousness Oil States paid patent eligibility patent infringement patent law patent litigation patent prosecution Personal Jurisdiction PGR Printed Publication PTAB reasonable expectation of success Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility Supreme Court Trademark Trade Secrets USPTO USPTO Director Venue Written Description

Archives

Contact Us

  • E-mail Dennis Crouch
  • E-mail Patently-O Jobs
  • Submit a Job Listing