Tag Archives: inventorship

All Inventors are Human; All Humans are Inventors

March 21, 2023Patentartificial intelligence, inventor, inventorship, paid, patent law, Section 100(f), Section 100(g)Dennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Standing to Challenge Inventorship

February 13, 2023Patentassignment of rights, inventorship, paid, patent law, reputational injury, standing to challenge inventorshipDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

AI and Inventorship – USPTO Request for Comments

February 13, 2023Patentartificial intelligence, inventorship, paid, patent law, Section 101, USPTODennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

An Update on AI Inventorship and Authorship Cases

January 24, 2023Patentai, inventorship, Oil States, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Reasonable Stories of Inventorship

December 21, 2022Patentinventorship, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Cross-Border Inventing

November 17, 2022Patentinventorship, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Minerals Separation v. Hyde, 242 U.S. 261 (1916)

November 13, 2022Patentinventorship, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Patently-O Bits and Bytes by Juvan Bonni

November 7, 2022Bits and Bytes, Patentinventorship, paidJuvan Bonni

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

A.I.Nventor

September 19, 2022Patentai, inventorship, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Only Humans are Inventive?

August 5, 2022Patentinventorship, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

He, She, or They in US Patent Law

June 28, 2022Patentinventorship, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

AI-Generated Invention at the Federal Circuit

May 31, 2022Patentai, inventorship, motivation to combine, obviousness, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Thaler v. Vidal: Will Patentability be Negated by the Manner of Invention?

May 9, 2022Patentai, inventorship, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

The Corporation as an Inventive Artificial Intelligence

April 13, 2022Patentai, inventorship, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Federal Circuit asked to Decide whether US Patent Law Excludes Non-Human Inventors

March 11, 2022Patentinventorship, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

See you Soon: Aug 19 Symposium and Publication Opportunities

August 18, 2021Patentinventorship, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Guest Post: DABUS Gains Traction: South Africa Becomes First Country to Recognize AI-Invented Patent

August 4, 2021Patentai, inventorship, paidJason Rantanen

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

“Shall be the Property” is not an Assignment of Patent Rights

August 2, 2021Patentinventorship, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

Conception for Joint Inventors

July 28, 2021Patentinventorship, paidDennis Crouch

by Dennis Crouch

Most patents involve two or more joint inventors who all claim to have contributed significantly to the invention. Conception of the invention is typically seen as the critical legal determinant of invention and some courts have written that each joint inventor must have contributed substantially to the conception of the invention.* Conception is typically referred to as a mental act. The MPEP, for example, includes a statement in all-caps that "CONCEPTION MUST BE DONE IN THE MIND OF THE INVENTOR." MPEP 2138.04(I). The basic rule is that the inventor must have a "definite and permanent idea of the complete and operable invention."

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.

En Banc: When Employees Leave with a Half-Baked Invention

July 7, 2021Patentinventorship, paidDennis Crouch

To continue reading, become a Patently-O member. Already a member? Simply log in to access the full post.